🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

The European Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering similar bans.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to approve a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a useful starting point," stated one parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive evidence".

Previously, support built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is largely unfolding at the regional level amid federal inaction.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some figures to mimic Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, other countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international conversation continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that states internationally are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.