🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.