🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy produced results, and disclosed new appeals had originated from intermediaries to reopen talks with the US government. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to visit struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is walking a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more resilient in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Abruptly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader claiming the locations had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated repeatedly they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if negotiations restart.

The American leader last week said he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the conference, designed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be ended by military means. He stated the attacks started with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making faith hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly tried to impose their demands during the talks. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the ultimate resolution to address conflicts, but its requirements, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"In case they speak to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the battle of restoration and recovery, the foreign minister said he was certain Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to obliterate, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."